E-Book, Englisch, 282 Seiten
Wells Science-Based Interviewing
1. Auflage 2020
ISBN: 978-1-0983-2394-3
Verlag: BookBaby
Format: EPUB
Kopierschutz: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet/DL/kein Kopierschutz
E-Book, Englisch, 282 Seiten
ISBN: 978-1-0983-2394-3
Verlag: BookBaby
Format: EPUB
Kopierschutz: PC/MAC/eReader/Tablet/DL/kein Kopierschutz
This book is about how to talk with people to learn what they know. It is applicable to a wide variety of contexts - law enforcement suspect, victim and witness interviews and interrogations, intelligence debriefs, and industry interviews (e.g., litigation, insurance fraud, human resources). The methods described in this book are all based on sound science and have been shown to be valid in a variety of real world settings. The authors have in-depth experience using these methods and with the underlying science.
Autoren/Hrsg.
Weitere Infos & Material
REFERENCES 1 Heuer, R. J. (1999). Psychology of intelligence analysis. Lulu.com. 2 Fingar, T. (2011). Analysis in the U.S. intelligence community: Missions, masters, and methods. In National Research Council, Intelligence Analysis: Behavioral and Social Scientific Foundations. Washington DC: The National Academies Press. 3 Richards, H. J., & Pherson, R. H. (2010). Structured analytic techniques for intelligence analysis. Cq Press. 4 Hope, L., Mullis, R., & Gabbert, F. (2013). Who? What? When? Using a timeline technique to facilitate recall of a complex event. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 20-24. 5 Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. (2nd Ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill. 6 Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contribution of majority and minority influence processes. Psychological Review, 93, 10-20. 7 U.S. National Academies of Sciences National Research Council (2011), Intelligence Analysis for Tomorrow: Advances from the Behavioral and Social Sciences. National Academies Press, Washington DC. 8 Tetlock, P. E. (2006). Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 9 Devine, D. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (1995). Expertise and task characteristics in decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 294-306. 10 Tinsley, C. (2011). Social categorization and intergroup dynamics. In National Research Council, Intelligence Analysis: Behavioral and Social Scientific Foundations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 11 Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131. 12 Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 105-110. 13 Gigerenzer, G. (2006). Out of the frying pan into the fire: Behavioral reactions to terrorist attacks. Risk Analysis, 26, 347-351. 14 Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454. 15 Frey, D. (1981b). Postdecisional preference for decision-relevant information as a function of the competence of its source and the degree of familiarity with this information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 51-67. 16 Dror, I. E., & Charlton, D. (2006). Why experts make errors. Journal of Forensic Identification, 56, 600-616. 17 Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., & Kukucka, J. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 42-52. 18 Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 173-220). New York: Academic Press. 19 Jones, E. E. & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-24. 20 Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299. 21 Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350. 22 Loftus, E. F. (2003). Make-believe memories. American Psychologist, 58, 867. 23 Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357. 24 Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58, 5 (Whole No. 270). 25 Glick, P., Wilk, K., & Perreault, M. (1995). Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes. Sex Roles, 32, 565-582. 26 Fiske, S.T. (2004). Social beings. New York: Wiley. 27 Johnston, L., & Hewstone, M. (1992). Cognitive models of stereotype change (3): Subtyping and the perceived typicality of disconfirming group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 360-386. 28 Hewstone, M. (1994). Revision and change of stereotypic beliefs: In search of the elusive subtyping model. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 69-109. Chichester West Sussex UK: Wiley Blackwell. 29 Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479. 30 Wheeler, M. E., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). Controlling racial prejudice: Social-cognitive goals affect amygdala and stereotype activation. Psychological Science, 16, 56-63. 31 Shawyer, A., Milne, R., and Bull, R. (2009). Investigative interviewing in the UK. In S. Savage, R. Milne, and T. Williamson (Eds.), International developments in investigative interviewing (pp. 24-38). Cullompton: Willan. 32 Harvard Law Review (2015). Dep’t of Justice, new department policy concerning electronic recording of statements. Recent Administrative Policy, 128, 1552-1559. 33 Press Release, Dep’t of Justice, Attorney General Holder Announces Significant Policy Shift Concerning Electronic Recording of Statements (May 22, 2014), http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-holder-announces-significant-policy-shift-concerning-electronic-recording [http://perma.cc/9G5Z 34 Cassell, P. G. (1996). Miranda’s social costs: An empirical reassessment. Northwestern University Law Review, 90, 387-499. 35 Guðjónsson, G. H. (1992). The psychology of interrogations, confessions and testimony. Chichester West Sussex UK: Wiley Blackwell. 36 Leo, R. A. (1996). The impact of Miranda revisited. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 621-692. 37 Leo, R. A. (2009). Police interrogation and American justice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. 38 Boetig, B. P., Vinson, D. M., & Weidel, B. R. (2006). Revealing incommunicado. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, December 2006, 1-10. 39 Geller, W. A. (1993). Videotaping interrogations and confessions. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. 40 Kassin, S. M. (1997). The Psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52, 221-223. 41 Lassiter, G. D. (2010). Psychological science and sound public policy: Video recording of custodial interrogations. American Psychologist, 65, 768-779. 42 Commonwealth v. DiGiambattista, 442 Mass. 423 (2004). 43 United States v. Azure, 1999 WL 33218402. 44 20 ILCS 3930/7.2(d) (Illinois custodial monitoring law). 45 Stephan v. State, 711 P.2d 1156 (Alaska 1985). 46 State v. Scales, 518 N.W.2d. 587, 592 (Minn. 1994). 47 Sullivan, T. P. (2014). Nat’l Ass’n of Criminal Def. Lawyers, Compendium: Electronic Recording of Custodial Interrogations. Accessed on 3 Aug 2016 at https://www.nacdl.org/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=33287&libID=33256 [https://perma.cc/CGW9-7YAH] 48 Sullivan, T. P. (2004). Police Experiences with Recording Custodial Interrogations. Northwestern School of Law, Center on Wrongful Convictions, I (Summer), 1-28. 49 Lassiter, G. D. (2002). Illusory causation in the courtroom. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 204-208. 50 Lassiter, G. D., & Geers, A. L. (2004). Bias and accuracy in the evaluation of confession evidence. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions and entrapment (pp. 197-214). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum. 51 Lassiter, G. D., Geers, A. L., Munhall, P. J., Handley, I. M., & Beers, M. J. (2001). Videotaped confessions: Is guilt in the eye of the camera? Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 189-254. 52 Lassiter, G. D., & Irvine, A. A. (1986). Videotaped confessions: The impact of camera point of view on judgments of coercion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 268-276. 53 Lassiter, G. D., Ware, L. J., Lindberg, M. J., & Ratcliff, J. J. (2010). Videotaping custodial interrogations: Toward a scientifically based policy. In G. D. Lassiter & C. A. Meissner (Eds.), Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations (pp. 143-160). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 54 McArthur, L. Z. (1980). Illusory causation and illusory correlation: Two epistemological accounts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 507-519. 55 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). 56 California v. Prysock, 453 U.S. 355 (1981). 57 Admonition of Rights (2012). Los Angeles Police Department 15.03.00...