All What Matters

The Facts about Global Climate Genesis
1. Auflage 2020
ISBN: 978-3-7528-8703-7
Verlag: BoD - Books on Demand

Buch, Englisch, 84 Seiten, Paperback, Format (B × H): 120 mm x 190 mm, Gewicht: 99 g

In an increasingly complex world, we are dependent on the expertise of others whose motives we do not know. Only independent thinking helps against the current climate hysteria. Because nothing of what the world community is now putting into climate hysteria has been scientifically proven:

There is no 97% consensus in science.

The climate impact of CO2 would be significantly below 1 degree Celsius.

A global CO2 budget would be continuously renewable.

However, CO2 is not the natural climate driver on our earth.

And there is also no "natural atmospheric greenhouse effect".

Rather, a sole solar climate forcing is quite likely.

All scientific evidence for these arguments could be found in this book. Consequently, we should not destroy our fossil-fueled industrial culture and our natural landscapes just to save a supposed "natural global climate"...

Autoren/Hrsg.

Weber, Uli

Über Autor(innen)

Weber, Uli
Uli Weber was educated at the CAU Kiel, Germany, in geophysics and has gained more than 30 years' experience in the international upstream oil business.
In the 1970s, the author was taught the basic principles of paleo-climatology. He therefore considered the early climate alarm of the 1980s to be a not entirely unselfish media focus on extremes in the spectrum of honest scientific knowledge. In the 1990s, he missed a bridge between current climate research and secured paleoclimatology, and in the 2000s, considerable contradictions emerged between the two. In the 2010s, the author then had the time to seriously examine the scientific arguments of the current climate hysteria. He first challenged the consistency of these foundations and then refuted them on the basis of established scientific laws.

Uli Weber:
Uli Weber was educated at the CAU Kiel, Germany, in geophysics and has gained more than 30 years' experience in the international upstream oil business.
In the 1970s, the author was taught the basic principles of paleo-climatology. He therefore considered the early climate alarm of the 1980s to be a not entirely unselfish media focus on extremes in the spectrum of honest scientific knowledge. In the 1990s, he missed a bridge between current climate research and secured paleoclimatology, and in the 2000s, considerable contradictions emerged between the two. In the 2010s, the author then had the time to seriously examine the scientific arguments of the current climate hysteria. He first challenged the consistency of these foundations and then refuted them on the basis of established scientific laws.