Liebe Besucherinnen und Besucher,
heute ab 15 Uhr feiern wir unser Sommerfest und sind daher nicht erreichbar. Ab morgen sind wir wieder wie gewohnt für Sie da. Wir bitten um Ihr Verständnis – Ihr Team von Sack Fachmedien
Buch, Englisch, 208 Seiten, Hardback
Buch, Englisch, 208 Seiten, Hardback
Reihe: Pitt Series in Russian and East European Studies
ISBN: 978-0-8229-3711-1
Verlag: University of Pittsburgh Press
Flourishing in Eastern Europe in the 1950s and 1960s, Marxist humanism helped to delegitimise the communist regimes, and it provided an intellectual basis for the successful assault on European communism in the 1980s. In this comparative study of the movement, Satterwhite focuses on Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and Yugoslavia - the four countries where the critical use of Marxist thought as the basis for rejecting the official ideology was fully developed. He draws upon research in the original languages for the most part, as well as on interviews and discussions with the critical thinkers themselves. Included are the critical views of Leszek Kolakowski from Poland, Karel Kosik from Czechoslovakia, Agnes Heller and Ferene Feher from Hungary, and Mihailo Markovic and Svetozar Stojanovic from Yugoslavia. Marxist humanism developed as a response to Stalinism from within Marxism. In their search for a human alternative to the dehumanising experience of Stalinism, certain critical thinkers - philosophers and sociologists - began to re-read and re-evaluate the Marxist texts. They developed a philosophical critique and refutation of the official ideology that led inexorably to a critique of the social, political, and cultural dimensions of the Stalinist system. Satterwhite traces the development of Marxist humanism in Eastern Europe throught a presentation of the key concepts as they were formulated by the various thinkers at different stages in their own intellectual growth. While he brings out the distinct features of each group studied, he finds a remarkable similarity in the end product. The fundamental unity underlying their efforts was not accidental. It derived from their common purpose and shared humanist perspective. Notes and a comprehensive bibliography provide a useful guide to writings by and about these key figures in the post-World War II period, whose thinking has had such a profound influence on our own times.
