Sangster Reinventing Structuralism

What Sign Relations Reveal About Consciousness
1. Auflage 2013
ISBN: 978-3-11-030497-8
Verlag: De Gruyter
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: 1 - PDF Watermark

E-Book, Englisch, 229 Seiten

Reihe: ISSN

This monograph argues that the structuralist movement in linguistics was curtailed prematurely, before its contribution to cognitive science could be fully realized. Building upon Roman Jakobson's pioneering work on the nature of the linguistic sign, a new and detailed appreciation of the role of sign relations in the ultimate structuring of consciousness is presented, proving that the structural approach has as much to contribute today as any current cognitive theory. This study takes the view that the structure which linguistic signs themselves evince should be treated as an organic property of mind in its own right, as the device by which the ultimate differences in meaning in the human cognitive sphere are realized. Adherence to this principle assumes not only that the linguistic sign must be fundamentally monosemic, but also that the level of abstraction at which the relations between signs function must lie beyond the logical or rational level where polysemy is the rule.

The study demonstrates that while the conceptual relations or categories uncovered at such a higher-order level of consciousness are of necessity highly abstract and hidden from normal awareness, they are nevertheless neither ineffable nor devoid of content. Rather, the categories identified and defined in this study are shown to have verifiable correlates at the supra-rational level where transpersonal rather than ego-oriented psychology operates, the level that Jung termed the collective unconscious. It is here that we find corresponding properties in reports from altered states of consciousness, in the structure of myths worldwide, as well as in studies of the image-making capacity of the human mind. Ultimately, when the structure of actual linguistic signs is treated as an ordered set of conceptual relations, one necessarily arrives at the conclusion that the sign relations of different languages are anything but Whorfian, but are all pointing to the same universal set of conceptual properties. This set of properties is then shown to be able to account for the relations between signs in all areas of linguistic structure, from the grammatical to the lexical and the syntactic.

The monograph goes on to provide a detailed account of the process of making reference, of how speakers are able to contextualize the truly abstract conceptual relations inherent in the structure of signs in their language, to produce a potentially infinite variety of polysemous meanings in actual speech situations at whatever level of concreteness they choose; and how the feedback from such acts of communication determines the evolutionary trajectory of a system of signs conceived as a living organism, specifically as a neuronal structure inherent in the human brain operating as a fundamentally probabilistic or stochastic system.

Zielgruppe

Research Libraries; Researchers and Advanced Students with an Interest in the Field of Structuralism; Any Lay Person Interested in How Language Works

Autoren/Hrsg.

Sangster, Rodney B.

Fachgebiete

• Geisteswissenschaften Sprachwissenschaft Sprachwissenschaften Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft
• Geisteswissenschaften Sprachwissenschaft Sprachwissenschaften Theoretische Linguistik

Inhaltsverzeichnis

1;Preface;7
2;Introduction: The promise of modern-day structuralism;13
3;1 Seeking the correlates of meaning in language;27
4;2 Sign relations as organic properties of mind;33
5;3 Language as a self-organizing system;41
6;4 Applying the sign principle to grammatical meaning;47
6.1;4.1 Past/non-past: The cancellation feature;48
6.2;4.2 Future/non-future: The objectiveness feature;52
6.3;4.3 Perfective/imperfective: The dimensionality feature;56
6.4;4.4 Plural/non-plural: The plurality feature;58
6.5;4.5 Relations creating separation: The distinctness feature;61
6.6;4.6 Relations defined on the present as a conceptual property: The extension feature;63
7;5 Case relations as a product of grammatical selection;67
7.1;5.1 The Russian accusative and instrumental;68
7.2;5.2 The Russian genitive and genitive/accusative;72
7.3;5.3 The Russian dative and subjectless sentences;76
7.4;5.4 The system of Russian cases;78
8;6 Extending the sign principle to syntax;81
8.1;6.1 The modification relation in English: The extension feature;85
8.2;6.2 The modification relation in Russian: The dimensionality feature;97
8.3;6.3 The modification relation in French: The plurality feature;106
9;7 The potential of sign theory in the domain of lexical meaning;113
9.1;7.1 Preliminary concepts;120
9.2;7.2 Verbal lexical systems;126
9.3;7.3 Nominal lexical systems;136
10;8 The feature hierarchy that defines human conceptual space;149
10.1;8.1 The evidence from transpersonal psychology;152
10.2;8.2 The evidence from the study of myth;157
11;9 Neurological evidence for the evolution of higher-order consciousness;165
11.1;9.1 The neurological structure of consciousness;165
11.2;9.2 The evolution of the language faculty;174
11.3;9.3 The sign relation and the origin of image-making;182
12;10 The position of structuralism in the modern era;193
12.1;10.1 Saussure’s langue and parole;193
12.2;10.2 Derrida’s différance;195
12.3;10.3 Lévi-strauss’ contentless structure;197
12.4;10.4 Lacan’s symbolic order;199
12.5;10.5 Bybee’s usage-based grammar;201
12.6;10.6 Jakobson’s relative autonomy;203
13;Epilogue: The wisdom of the primal mind;207
14;Bibliography;213
15;Glossary;219
16;Index;225

Über Autor(innen)

Rodney B. Sangster, University of California, USA.