Buch, Englisch, 286 Seiten, Format (B × H): 152 mm x 229 mm, Gewicht: 517 g
Procedural Habits
Buch, Englisch, 286 Seiten, Format (B × H): 152 mm x 229 mm, Gewicht: 517 g
Reihe: Routledge Studies in Rhetoric and Communication
ISBN: 978-0-367-89090-2
Verlag: Taylor & Francis Ltd
The Rhetoric of Videogames as Embodied Practice offers a critical reassessment of embodiment and materiality in rhetorical considerations of videogames. Holmes argues that rhetorical and philosophical conceptions of "habit" offer a critical resource for describing the interplay between thinking (writing and rhetoric) and embodiment. The book demonstrates how Aristotle's understanding of character (ethos), habit (hexis), and nature (phusis) can productively connect rhetoric to what Holmes calls "procedural habits": the ways in which rhetoric emerges from its interactions with the dynamic accumulation of conscious and nonconscious embodied experiences that consequently give rise to meaning, procedural subjectivity, control, and communicative agency both in digital game design discourse and the activity of play.
Zielgruppe
Postgraduate and Undergraduate
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
- Mathematik | Informatik EDV | Informatik EDV & Informatik Allgemein Soziale und ethische Aspekte der EDV
- Mathematik | Informatik EDV | Informatik Digital Lifestyle Computerspiele, Internetspiele
- Mathematik | Informatik EDV | Informatik Professionelle Anwendung
- Sozialwissenschaften Sport | Tourismus | Freizeit Hobbies & Spiele
Weitere Infos & Material
Introduction
Part I: Theorizing Procedural Habits
1. Persuasive Technologies in the Rhetoric of Videogames
2. From Persuasive Technologies to Procedural Habits
Part II: Thinking Persuasive Technologies Differently
3. Affective Design and the Captivation of Memory in First-Person Shooter
Videogames
4. Gamification and Suggestion Technologies (Kairos) Beyond Critique
5. Achieving Eudaimonia in Free-to-Play Social Media Games
6. The Habits of Highly Unsuccessful Nonhuman Computational Actors
7. The Materiality of Play as Public Rhetoric Pedagogy
Conclusion