Buch, Englisch, Band 35, 336 Seiten, Format (B × H): 163 mm x 240 mm, Gewicht: 611 g
Buch, Englisch, Band 35, 336 Seiten, Format (B × H): 163 mm x 240 mm, Gewicht: 611 g
Reihe: Brill's Companions to the Christian Tradition
ISBN: 978-90-04-18346-9
Verlag: Brill
Contributors include: Richard Cross, Gregory T. Doolan, H.J.M.J. Goris, Tobias Hoffmann, Peter King, Timothy B. Noone, Giorgio Pini, Bernd Roling, and John F. Wippel.
Zielgruppe
All those interested in medieval philosophy and theology, intellectual history, metaphysics, philosophy of mind, and philosophy of language.
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
- Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Geschichte der Westlichen Philosophie Mittelalterliche & Scholastische Philosophie
- Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Religionsphilosophie, Philosophische Theologie
- Geisteswissenschaften Religionswissenschaft Religionswissenschaft Allgemein Religionsphilosophie, Philosophische Theologie
Weitere Infos & Material
Acknowledgments
Introduction
I. Aquinas on the Demonstrability of Angels
Gregory T. Doolan
II. Metaphysical Composition of Angels in Bonaventure, Aquinas, and Godfrey of Fontaines
John F. Wippel
III. The Individuation of Angels from Bonaventure to Duns Scotus
Giorgio Pini
IV. Angelic Time and Motion: Bonaventure to Duns Scotus
Richard Cross
V. Angelic Knowledge in Aquinas and Bonaventure
Harm Goris
VI. Duns Scotus on Angelic Knowledge
Timothy B. Noone
VII. Angelic Language and Communication
Bernd Roling
VIII. Augustine and Anselm on Angelic Sin
Peter King
IX. Theories of Angelic Sin from Aquinas to Ockham
Tobias Hoffmann
Bibliography
Index of Manuscripts
Index of Names
INTRODUCTION
Angels are, so to speak, situated between human beings and God. Like humans, they are ra-tional creatures; like God, they are immaterial. This is what made angels interesting to medieval thinkers, whose treatises on angelology at times exceed in length those of theological and philosophical anthropology. Their motivation was not only to reflect on the role of angels in the history of salvation, as God’s messengers and as protectors (or tempters) of human beings. They were also interested, and perhaps more so, in clarifying problems that concerned angels and humans alike. For example, angelology provided an ideal context for discussions about the ontological status of creatures, the characteristics and mechanics of knowledge, the conditions for the exercise of free will, and the supernatural destiny of rational creatures.
The present volume explores the philosophical side of medieval angelology as developed by Christian theologians. As a matter of fact, some of the most famous doctrines of medieval philosophy were developed by discussing angels, such as Anselm of Canterbury’s two affections of the will (for self-benefit and for justice), Thomas Aquinas’s distinction of essence and esse (the act of existence), Duns Scotus’s theory of an individual difference (haecceitas), and—as Timothy Noone argues in his essay—Scotus’s doctrine of intuitive cognition. Literature on these topics tends to mention the angelological background of these doctrines in passing, at best. The emergence itself of these notions or theories from within the context of angelology, however, is something worth studying in ist own right.
The idea that there are immaterial beings other than God is not unique to Christian theology. Not only other theological traditions, such as Judaism and Islam, but also pagan philosophers assumed their existence. Apart from God, Aristotle also posited other “separate substances” (that is, bodiless intelligent beings) in order to account for the movement of the heavenly spheres. Neoplatonic thinkers posited angels as mediators between the One and humanity and in order to avoid any gaps in the hierarchy of beings. Accordingly, Christian theologians could assume their existence not only on account of Christian revelation, but also on philosophical grounds. Carlos Bazán recently argued, however, that all philosophical arguments for the existence of non-divine separate substances as proposed by Ancient or Medieval philosophers fail, inasmuch as they are either based upon obsolete astronomical assumptions or upon questionable epistemological premises. He concludes that “[s]ince there are no valid philosophical demonstrations of their existence, separate substances should no longer be a subject of philosophical consideration.”
Whatever one might think about the demonstrative force of philosophical arguments for the existence of angels—a topic that will be addressed by Gregory Doolan in the first chapter—Bazán’s conclusion that “their notion should be excluded from philosophical discourse” does not follow. Rather, as I hope this volume will show, the notion of angels is eminently illuminating for philosophical reflections.
There are several advantages to discussing philosophical issues in connection with an-gels. First, taking the situation of angels into account implies transcending the conditions of material reality, allowing us to study creatureliness as such. Thus angelology provided the medievals with the context for clarifying the act-potency composition of creatures as well as the individuation of substances in general. Second, this perspective simplifies complex issues by reducing the parameters to a minimum, much like classroom physics that calculates acceleration under ideal conditions by ignoring friction. Whether or not one believes in the existence of angels, the hypothesis of purely intellectual beings has a function analogous to contemporary thought experiments that investigate philosophical problem