Buch, Englisch, 518 Seiten, Format (B × H): 180 mm x 256 mm, Gewicht: 1066 g
Law and Morality in an Asymmetrical World
Buch, Englisch, 518 Seiten, Format (B × H): 180 mm x 256 mm, Gewicht: 1066 g
Reihe: Ethics, National Security, and the Rule of Law
ISBN: 978-0-19-964647-0
Verlag: Oxford University Press
The war on terror is remaking conventional warfare. The protracted battle against a non-state organization, the demise of the confinement of hostilities to an identifiable battlefield, the extensive involvement of civilian combatants, and the development of new and more precise military technologies have all conspired to require a rethinking of the law and morality of war. Just war theory, as traditionally articulated, seems ill-suited to justify many of the
practices of the war on terror. The raid against Osama Bin Laden's Pakistani compound was the highest profile example of this strategy, but the issues raised by this technique cast a far broader net: every week the U.S. military and CIA launch remotely piloted drones to track suspected terrorists in hopes of
launching a missile strike against them.
In addition to the public condemnation that these attacks have generated in some countries, the legal and moral basis for the use of this technique is problematic. Is the U.S. government correct that nations attacked by terrorists have the right to respond in self-defense by targeting specific terrorists for summary killing? Is there a limit to who can legitimately be placed on the list? There is also widespread disagreement about whether suspected terrorists should be considered combatants
subject to the risk of lawful killing under the laws of war or civilians protected by international humanitarian law. Complicating the moral and legal calculus is the fact that innocent bystanders are often killed or injured in these attacks. This book addresses these issues. Featuring chapters by an
unrivalled set of experts, it discusses all aspects of targeted killing, making it unmissable reading for anyone interested in the implications of this practice.
Zielgruppe
Scholars and students of the law of armed conflict, moral philosophy and Just War Theory; policymakers and military lawyers involved in the War on Terror.
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
- Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Politische Kultur Menschenrechte, Bürgerrechte
- Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Militärwesen Nationale und Internationale Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik
- Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Politische Gewalt Revolutionäre Gruppen und Bewegungen, Bewaffnete Konflikte
- Rechtswissenschaften Internationales Recht und Europarecht Internationales Recht Internationales Kriegsrecht, Territorialrecht, Humanitäres Recht
- Rechtswissenschaften Internationales Recht und Europarecht Internationales Recht Internationale Menschen- und Minderheitenrechte, Kinderrechte
- Interdisziplinäres Wissenschaften Wissenschaften Interdisziplinär Friedens- und Konfliktforschung
- Rechtswissenschaften Internationales Recht und Europarecht Internationales Recht Internationales Strafrecht, Internationales Verfahrensrecht
- Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Internationale Beziehungen Konflikt- und Friedensforschung, Rüstungskontrolle, Abrüstung
- Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Politische Gewalt Terrorismus, Religiöser Fundamentalismus
Weitere Infos & Material
Preface
Andrew Altman : Introduction
PART I: THE CHANGING FACE OF WAR: TARGETING NON-COMBATANTS
1: Mark "Max" Maxwell: Allowing the State to Rebut the Civilian Presumption: Playing Whack-A-Mole Without a Mallet?
2: Jens David Ohlin: Targeting Co-belligerents
3: Daniel Statman: Can Just War Theory Justify Targeted Killing? Three Possible Models
4: Jeremy Waldron : Justifying Targeted Killing With a Neutral Principle?
PART II: NORMATIVE FOUNDATIONS: LAW ENFORCEMENT OR WAR?
5: Jeff McMahan: The Ethics of Targeted Killing on a Moral Continuum
6: Claire Finkelstein: Targeted Killing as Preemptive Action
7: Richard V. Meyer : The Privilege of Belligerency and Formal Declarations of War
PART III: TARGETED KILLING AND SELF-DEFENSE
8: Craig Martin: Going Medieval: Targeted Killing, Self-Defense, and the Jus ad Bellum Regime
9: Russell Christopher: Imminence in Justified Targeted Killing
10: Phil Montague : Defending Defensive Targeted Killings
PART IV: EXERCISING JUDGMENT IN TARGETED KILLING DECISIONS
11: Amos N. Guiora: The Importance of Criteria-Based Reasoning in Targeted Killing Decisions
12: Gregory S. McNeal: Are Targeted Killings Unlawful? A Case Study in Empirical Claims without Empirical Evidence
13: Kevin H. Govern: Operation Neptune Spear: Was Killing Bin Laden a Legitimate Military Objective?
14: Kenneth Anderson : Efficiency in Bello and ad Bellum: Making the Use of Force Too Easy?
PART V: UTILITARIAN TRADE-OFFS AND DEONTOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS
15: Fernando R. Tesón: Targeted Killing and the Logic of Double Effect
16: Michael S. Moore: Targeted Killings and the Morality of Hard Choices
17: Leo Katz: Targeted Killing and the Strategic use of Self-Defense
Index




