Buch, Englisch, 272 Seiten, Format (B × H): 157 mm x 235 mm, Gewicht: 590 g
Buch, Englisch, 272 Seiten, Format (B × H): 157 mm x 235 mm, Gewicht: 590 g
ISBN: 978-1-107-10101-2
Verlag: Cambridge University Press
How does political party control determine changes to social policy, and by extension, influence inequality in America? Conventional theories show that Democratic control of the federal government produces more social expenditures and less inequality. Welfare for the Wealthy re-examines this relationship by evaluating how political party power results in changes to both public social spending and subsidies for private welfare - and how a trade-off between the two, in turn, affects income inequality. Christopher Faricy finds that both Democrats and Republicans have increased social spending over the last forty-two years. And while both political parties increase federal social spending, Democrats and Republicans differ in how they spend federal money, which socioeconomic groups benefit, and the resulting consequences for income inequality.
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften Volkswirtschaftslehre Öffentliche Finanzwirtschaft, Besteuerung
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften Volkswirtschaftslehre Wohlfahrtsökonomie
- Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Politikwissenschaft Allgemein
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften Volkswirtschaftslehre Wirtschaftspolitik, politische Ökonomie
- Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Regierungspolitik Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik
- Sozialwissenschaften Soziologie | Soziale Arbeit Soziale Arbeit/Sozialpädagogik Soziale Dienste, Soziale Organisationen
Weitere Infos & Material
1. The politics of social policy in America; 2. The partisan politics of the divided US social welfare state; 3. Political parties and public social spending: testing the conventional wisdom; 4. Government subsidies and the private American social system: the special case of tax expenditures; 5. A Republican welfare state?; 6. The modality of social spending and income inequality in America; 7. The implications of the divided American welfare state.