Buch, Englisch, 272 Seiten, Format (B × H): 161 mm x 240 mm, Gewicht: 558 g
Buch, Englisch, 272 Seiten, Format (B × H): 161 mm x 240 mm, Gewicht: 558 g
Reihe: Environmental Ethics and Science Policy Series
ISBN: 978-0-19-975562-2
Verlag: ACADEMIC
This is the first book in the humanities or social sciences to examine the scientific evidence for the hormesis phenomenon and its social implications
It also provides a new case study for historians, philosophers, and sociologists of science interested in the ways that social and ethical values intersect with scientific research
It provides a new analysis of the ways that decisions about scientific language (e.g., choices about how to define phenomena or about what terms to employ) can have significant social ramifications, even in a seemingly innocuous field like toxicology
Could low-level exposure to polluting chemicals be analogous to exercise-a beneficial source of stress that strengthens the body? Some scientists studying the phenomenon of hormesis (beneficial or stimulatory effects caused by low-dose exposure to toxic substances) claim that that this may be the case. Is A Little Pollution Good For You? Critically examines the current evidence for hormesis. In the process, it highlights the range of methodological and interpretive judgments involved in environmental research: choices about what questions to ask and how to study them, decisions about how to categorize and describe new information, judgments about how to interpret and evaluate ambiguous evidence, and questions about how to formulate public policy in response to debated scientific findings. The book also uncovers the ways that interest groups with deep pockets attempt to influence these scientific judgments for their benefit. Several chapters suggest ways to counter these influences and incorporate a broader array of societal values in environmental research: (1) moving beyond conflict-of-interest policies to develop new ways of safeguarding academic research from potential biases; (2) creating deliberative forums in which multiple stakeholders can discuss the judgments involved in policy-relevant research; and (3) developing ethical guidelines that can assist scientific experts in disseminating debated and controversial phenomena to the public. Kevin C. Elliott illustrates these strategies in the hormesis case, as well as in two additional case studies involving contemporary environmental research: endocrine disruption and multiple chemical sensitivity. This book should be of interest to a wide variety of readers, including scientists, philosophers, policy makers, environmental ethicists and activists, research ethicists, industry leaders, and concerned citizens.
Zielgruppe
The primary audience is philosophers of science, and secondarily historians and sociologists of science. Some of the other crucial audiences are: (1) toxicologists; (2) research ethicists; (3) science policy makers; (4) environmental ethicists; and (5) environmental organizations and activists. General readers who are concerned about environmental issues, especially pollution, could very well be interested in the book.
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
Weitere Infos & Material
Table of Contents
1.: Introduction: Societal Values and Environmental Research
Overview of the Book
Chapter Summaries
Conclusion
2.: The Hormesis Case
Setting the Stage
Brief History of Hormesis Research
Choosing and Designing Studies
Developing Scientific Language
Evaluating and Interpreting Studies
Applying Research
Conclusion
3.: An Argument for Societal Values in Policy-Relevant Research
Background on Values in Science
The Easy Cases
Values in the Development of Scientific Language
Values in the Evaluation and Interpretation of Studies
Conclusion
4.: Lesson #1: Safeguarding Science
Special-Interest Science
University Conflict-of-Interest Policies
Additional Responses
Conclusion
Review
Ongoing Questions
Conclusion
