Buch, Englisch, Band 92, 252 Seiten, Format (B × H): 160 mm x 241 mm, Gewicht: 559 g
Reihe: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
Jurisdiction, Law-Making and Pluralisms
Buch, Englisch, Band 92, 252 Seiten, Format (B × H): 160 mm x 241 mm, Gewicht: 559 g
Reihe: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
ISBN: 978-3-030-78474-4
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
The book outlines a model that makes it possible to focus on and address these issues in a sustainable manner, that is, to respond to individual requests and technological advances in the field of biolaw by consistently and effectively applying suitable legal instruments and jurisdictional interpretation.
Zielgruppe
Research
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
- Rechtswissenschaften Öffentliches Recht Medizin- und Gesundheitsrecht
- Rechtswissenschaften Recht, Rechtswissenschaft Allgemein Rechtsphilosophie, Rechtsethik
- Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Rechtsphilosophie, Rechtsethik
- Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Ethik, Moralphilosophie
- Rechtswissenschaften Recht, Rechtswissenschaft Allgemein Rechtssoziologie, Rechtspsychologie, Rechtslinguistik
- Rechtswissenschaften Recht, Rechtswissenschaft Allgemein Rechtsgeschichte, Recht der Antike
- Rechtswissenschaften Recht, Rechtswissenschaft Allgemein Rechtsvergleichung
- Medizin | Veterinärmedizin Medizin | Public Health | Pharmazie | Zahnmedizin Medizin, Gesundheitswesen Medizinrecht, Gesundheitsrecht
Weitere Infos & Material
Part 1. Adjudication and Regulation Facing Pluralisms: Models And Trend.- Perspectives.- BioLaw facing pluralisms: three simple models for complex issues.- Some patterns for “scientific adjudication”: the role of courts in reconciling axiological pluralism and scientific complexity.- Part 2: Accommodating Pluralisms Beyond Courts?: Institutions and Tools.- Research Ethics Committees.- Consultative boards at international level.- Reckoning with growing pluralism. Potentials and limits of conscientious objection: Conscience clauses in abortion laws in Europe.- Professional (medical) ethics.- Part 3. Case Studies.- Axiological Pluralism: Conflict in the Hospital, Resolution in the Courts.- Moral pluralism and health claims as a challenge for the democratic principle. The cases of non validated therapies and vaccinations.- Reliance on Scientific Claims in Social and Legal Contexts: An ‘HIV and AIDS’ Case Study.- Reproductive Rights.- End of life issues.- Patient’s rights at the end of lifein Chilean legal system. Legal and jurisprudential analysis from a biolaw’s perspective.