Buch, Englisch, 87 Seiten, Format (B × H): 155 mm x 235 mm, Gewicht: 172 g
Reihe: SpringerBriefs in Law
A Fundamental Right Established Between Security and Freedom
Buch, Englisch, 87 Seiten, Format (B × H): 155 mm x 235 mm, Gewicht: 172 g
Reihe: SpringerBriefs in Law
ISBN: 978-3-032-07484-3
Verlag: Springer-Verlag GmbH
This book critically addresses one of the most complex issues in procedural law: the objective limits of res judicata. Particularly relevant in civil law countries such as Italy and Germany—and especially in Portugal—this topic has generated intense doctrinal debate. In an effort to circumvent the constraints imposed by the traditional model of the and the , Portuguese legal scholarship developed the concept of the . However, the vague contours of this concept have led to doctrinal uncertainty and inconsistency.
Does extend only to the operative part of the judgment, or does it also encompass its reasoning? Is only the claim precluded, or also the cause of action? Which issues that arise during litigation are barred from future disputes? The more freedom allowed to relitigate such issues, the less legal certainty the decision provides. Conversely, the more stabilizing the decision, the narrower the scope for future litigation.
This work proposes an alternative to the perplexing approaches that have challenged jurists within the Romano-Germanic tradition—particularly in Portugal: should also extend to prejudicial questions, provided they were effectively litigated by the parties, with full procedural guarantees, and expressly decided. This proposal reflects an adaptation of the Anglo-American model of , already partially adopted by Brazilian legislation, with a powerful pacifying effect.
The monograph is divided into three parts. The first examines the Anglo-American model of stabilizing judicial decisions, from the pre-Roman influence on to the , including the requirements of , partially incorporated into Brazilian law. The second part explores the core concepts of the controversy—main and prejudicial issues, preclusion, , authority and plea of —and presents the tension between legal certainty and freedom at the heart of the fundamental right to , drawing on a profound insight by Zygmunt Bauman.
Ultimately, this book argues that its proposed framework offers a constitutionally sound interpretation of the fundamental right to , striking a careful balance between the prohibition of excessive restriction and the need to avoid insufficient legal protection. The third and final part turns to the procedural topology of —exploring where, within the complaint, defense, and judgment, the preclusive effect truly resides: whether in the claims, the causes of action, the operative part, or the reasoning. It also revisits the historic debate between Savigny and Chiovenda, suggesting that their positions may be more compatible than traditionally assumed. The analysis concludes that the subject matter of the dispute encompasses not only the principal issue but also the prejudicial questions that were effectively litigated, offering a critical perspective on the Italian legislative model, later adopted in Portugal and formerly in Brazil’s Code of Civil Procedure.
Zielgruppe
Research
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
Weitere Infos & Material
1. Introduction.- 2. The Anglo-Saxon solution: collateral estoppel and the judgement on the matter.- 3. The Roman-Germanic problems: in search of the fundamental legal conformation of the right to res judicata.- 4. The Constitutional Limits of Extending Res Judicata to Preliminary Issues.- 5. Conclusion.
