Shaw The Gregorian Mission to Kent in Bede's Ecclesiastical History

Methodology and Sources
1. Auflage 2018
ISBN: 978-1-351-66945-0
Verlag: Taylor & Francis
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: Adobe DRM (»Systemvoraussetzungen)

E-Book, Englisch, 288 Seiten

Historians have long relied on Bede’s Ecclesiastical History for their narrative of early Christian Anglo-Saxon England, but what material lay behind Bede’s own narrative? What were his sources and how reliable were they? How much was based on contemporary material? How much on later evidence? What was rhetoric? What represents his own agendas, deductions or even inventions?

This book represents the first systematic attempt to answers these questions for Bede’s History, taking as a test case the coherent narrative of the Gregorian mission and the early Church in Kent. Through this critique, it becomes possible, for the first time, to catalogue Bede’s sources and assess their origins, provenance and value – even reconstructing the original shape of many that are now lost. The striking paucity of Bede’s primary sources for the period emerges clearly. This study explains the reason why this was the case. At the same time, Bede is shown to have had access to a greater variety of texts, especially documentary, than has previously been realised.

This volume thus reveals Bede the historian at work, with implications for understanding his monastery, library and intellectual milieu together with the world in which he lived and worked. It also showcases what can be achieved using a similar methodology for the rest of the Ecclesiastical History and for other contemporary works.

Most importantly, thanks to this study, it is now feasible – indeed necessary – for subsequent historians to base their reconstructions of the events of c.600 not on Bede but on Bede’s sources. As a result, this book lays the foundations for future work on the conversion of Anglo-Saxon England and offers the prospect of replacing and not merely refining Bede’s narrative of the history of early Christian Kent.

Autoren/Hrsg.

Shaw, Richard

Fachgebiete

• Geisteswissenschaften Geschichtswissenschaft Alte Geschichte & Archäologie Mittelalterliche, neuzeitliche Archäologie (Europa)

Inhaltsverzeichnis

1. Introduction: An Early Medieval Historian at Work

1.1 Recent work on Bede and the Historia ecclesiastica

1.2 Bede’s methods and materials: the need for a systematic analysis

1.3 The implications of this study

1.4 The structure of this study

1.5 Methodology

1.6 Bede the historian

1.7 Bede’s introduction to his own sources in the HE Preface

PART ONE

Constructing the Narrative of the Gregorian Mission to Kent

2. Gregory and the Mission: HE 1.23-33

3. The Mission Fathers: HE 2.1-11; 15-20

4. Canterbury before Theodore: HE 3.8; 3.14; 3.20; 3.29; 4.1

PART TWO

Bede’s Sources for Kent before Theodore

5. Bede’s Sources Reconstructed

5.1 Political

5.1.1 King lists

5.1.2 Genealogies

5.1.3 The context for the preservation and maintenance of Bede’s

king lists and genealogies

5.1.4 ‘Hegemon list’ document

5.1.5 ‘Hidage document’ of the ‘tribute’ type

5.1.6 Kentish laws

5.2 Ecclesiastical

5.2.1 Episcopal Lists

5.2.2 The origins of Bede’s episcopal lists

5.2.3 Inscriptions from (re-)foundation stones

5.2.4 Epitaphs

5.2.5 Ecclesiastical correspondence

5.3 ‘Literary’ and other written sources

5.4 Oral information

5.5 Bede’s Canterbury sources

5.6 Conclusions: the disappearance of ‘Canterbury tradition’

6. Bede’s ‘Canterbury Tales’

6.1 The unexplained sections of the Gregorian mission narrative

6.2 Characteristics of the ‘Canterbury tales’

6.3 The shape and content of Bede’s ‘Canterbury tales’

6.4 Nature of the ‘Canterbury tales’

6.5 Dating the ‘Canterbury tales’

6.6 Conclusions

7. Conclusion: Bede’s Methods and Ours

Bibliography

Über Autor(innen)

Richard Shaw is Associate Professor and Chairman of the History Department at Our Lady Seat of Wisdom College. He has published on Antony of Egypt, Cassiodorus, Gregory of Tours, Augustine of Canterbury, Bede, Ælfric of Eynsham, Thomas Aquinas and François de Laval. He was awarded the 2014 Eusebius Essay Prize by the Journal of Ecclesiastical History and was shortlisted for the 2016 Medium Ævum Essay Prize.