Criminal Law Conversations

1. Auflage 2011
ISBN: 978-0-19-986127-9
Verlag: Oxford University Press

Buch, Englisch, 762 Seiten, Format (B × H): 156 mm x 234 mm, Gewicht: 1135 g

Criminal Law Conversations provides an authoritative overview of contemporary criminal law debates in the United States. This collection of high caliber scholarly papers was assembled using an innovative and interactive method of nominations and commentary by the nation's top legal scholars. Virtually every leading scholar in the field has participated, resulting in a volume of interest to those both in and
outside of the community. Criminal Law Conversations showcases the most captivating of these essays, and provides insight into the most fundamental and provocative questions of modern criminal law.

Zielgruppe

Academics, law students,those interested in criminal law

Autoren/Hrsg.

Robinson, Paul H.

Garvey, Stephen P.

Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler

Garvey, Stephen

Kessler Ferzan, Kimberly

Fachgebiete

• Rechtswissenschaften Ausländisches Recht Common Law (UK, USA, Australien u.a.)

Inhaltsverzeichnis

i. Principles
Chapter 1. Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law
Meir Dan-Cohen
Comments:

Kyron Huigens-Duress Is Never a Conduct Rule
Samuel W. Buell-Decision Rule as Notice: The Case of Fraud
Anne M. Coughlin-Of Decision Rules and Conduct Rules, or Doing the Police in Different Voices
Luís Duarte d'Almeida-Separation, But Not of Rules
Adil Ahmad Haque-The Constitutive Function of Criminal Law
Eric J. Miller-Are There Two Types of Decision Rule?
Malcolm Thorburn-A Liberal Criminal Law Cannot Be Reduced to These Two Types of Rules
Reply:

Meir Dan-Cohen
Chapter 2. Empirical Desert
Paul H. Robinson
Comments:

Mary Sigler-The False Promise of Empirical Desert
Adam J. Kolber-Compliance-Promoting Intuitions
Michael T. Cahill-A Fertile Desert?
Alice Ristroph-The New Desert
Youngjae Lee-Keeping Desert Honest
Matthew Lister-Desert: Empirical, Not Metaphysical
Alice Ristroph-Response to Lee and Lister
Joseph E. Kennedy-Empirical Desert and the Endpoints of Punishment
Andrew E. Taslitz-Empirical Desert: The Yin and Yang of Criminal Justice
Adil Ahmad Haque-Legitimacy as Strategy
Laura I. Appleman-Sentencing, Empirical Desert, and Restorative Justice
Reply:

Paul H. Robinson
Chapter 3. Defending Preventive Detention
Christopher Slobogin
Comments:

Michael Louis Corrado-Slobogin on Dehumanization
Michael Marcus-Don't Abandon Sentencing Reform to Defend Preventive Detention
Rinat Kitai-Sangero-The Presumption of Innocence versus Preventive Detention
Matt Matravers-Unreliability, Innocence, and Preventive Detention
Joseph E. Kennedy-The Dangers of Dangerousness as a Basis of Incarceration
Reply:

Christopher Slobogin
Chapter 4. The Economics of Crime Control
Doron Teichman
Comments:

Russell D. Covey-The Limits of the Economic Model: Becker's Crime and Punishment
Alon Harel-The Economic Analysis of Crime Control: A Friendly Critique
Keith N. Hylton-Effi cient Deterrence and Crime Control
Morris B. Hoffman-Law, Economics, and Neuroethical Realism
Reply:

Doron Teichman
Chapter 5. The Difficulties of Deterrence as a Distributive Principle
Paul H. Robinson
Comments:

Russell D. Covey-Deterrence's Complexity
Douglas A. Berman-Making Deterrence Work Better
Doron Teichman-In Defense of Deterrence
Jonathan S. Masur, Richard H. McAdams, and Thomas J. Miles-For General Deterrence
Reply:

Paul H. Robinson
Chapter 6. Why only the State may Inflict Criminal Sanctions: The Case Against Privately Inflicted Sanctions
Alon Harel
Comments:

Miriam Baer-Eliminating the Divide Between the State and Its Citizens
Doron Teichman-Why the State May Delegate the Infliction of Criminal Sanctions
Malcolm Thorburn-Why Only the State May Decide when Sanctions Are Appropriate
Stuart P. Green-Why Do Privately Inflicted Criminal Sanctions Matter?
Reply:

Alon Harel
Chapter 7. Results Don't Matter
Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan
Comments:

Gerald Leonard-Some Reasons Why Criminal Harms Matter
Peter Westen-Why Criminal Harms Matter
Thomas Morawetz-Results Don't Matter, But.
Jeremy Horder-On the Reducibility of Crimes
Reply:

Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan
Chapter 8. Post-Modern Meditations on Punishment: On the Limits of Reason and the Virtue of Randomization Bernard E. Harcourt
Comments:

Alice Ristroph-Games Punishers Play
Michael M. O'Hear-Chance's Domain
Alon Harel-The Lure of Ambivalent Skepticism
Ken Levy-Punishment Must Be Justified Or Not at All
Reply:

Bernard E. Harcourt
Chapter 9. Remorse, Apology, and Mercy
Jeffrie G. Murphy
Comments:

Sherry F. Colb-Retaining Remorse
Stephanos Bibas-Invasions of Conscience and Faked Apologies

Über Autor(innen)

Paul H. Robinson is Professor of Law at the University of Pennsylvania School of Law and most recently the author of Distributive Principles of Criminal Law (OUP, 2008).

Stephen Garvey is Professor of Law at Cornell University School of Law.

Kimberly Kessler Ferzan is Professor of Law at Rutgers University School of Law, Camden.