E-Book, Englisch, 96 Seiten
E-Book, Englisch, 96 Seiten
ISBN: 978-3-8428-2992-3
Verlag: Diplomica Verlag
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: 0 - No protection
NGOs run multiple attempts to contribute to the resolution of conflicts on all political levels. They bring together people on the grass-root level, they try to influence high officials through public pressure and they organise conferences and discussions with members and consultants of the concerned parties. The latter approach is analysed in this study.
But how do NGOs influence the level of official international relations? To which degree can NGOs improve the relations of two conflicted parties, especially when the conflict is protracted and severe? The aim of this book is to define the preconditions of successful NGO mediation, to measure the NGO influence as an 'antecedent condition' for successful mediation, and to exhibit its limits. The underlying assumption is that conflict resolution is more likely if NGO mediation supports this attempt. This approach can be labelled as an 'assumption of constant effect' since the focus is on understanding the NGOs influence on international conflict resolution.
Tilman Pradt, geboren 1979, studierte Politikwissenschaften am Otto-Suhr-Institut der Freien Universität Berlin. Der Schwerpunkt seiner Studien lag auf den Internationalen Beziehungen, besonders die Analyse von komplizierten internationalen Konflikten und Möglichkeiten inoffizieller Diplomatie faszinierten ihn. Praktika in NGOs führten ihn zum Thema seiner Diplomarbeit in der er die Möglichkeiten von Nichtregierungsorganisationen als Mediatoren in internationalen Konflikten untersuchte.
Autoren/Hrsg.
Weitere Infos & Material
1;Israeli-Palestinian negotiations in the 1990s: How NGOs facilitated the peace process;1
1.1;Contents;3
1.2;Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Groups;5
1.3;PART I - INTRODUCTION;7
1.3.1;Mediators in world politics;8
1.3.2;History;9
1.3.3;“Arguing” vs. “bargaining”;11
1.3.4;TRACK-II;14
1.3.5;NGO definition;18
1.3.6;International conflict mediations;19
1.3.6.1;Participants;20
1.3.6.2;Character of conflict;21
1.3.6.3;Time of mediation (stage/ phase of conflict);23
1.3.6.4;Kind of mediation (participation/ role of mediator);25
1.3.6.5;Secrecy;27
1.3.6.6;Funding;29
1.3.6.7;Backing of governments;30
1.3.6.8;Outcome-measurement;32
1.4;PART II – CASE STUDIES;34
1.4.1;Definition moderate/ hard-liner;37
1.4.2;Case 1 - American Academy of Arts and Sciences;38
1.4.2.1;Participants;39
1.4.2.2;Character of conflict;42
1.4.2.3;Stage of Conflict;43
1.4.2.4;Participation;44
1.4.2.5;Secrecy;44
1.4.2.6;Funding;45
1.4.2.7;Backing;46
1.4.2.8;Outcome;46
1.4.3;Case 2 – FAFO (Oslo);48
1.4.3.1;Participants;49
1.4.3.2;Character of conflict;50
1.4.3.3;Stage of conflict;51
1.4.3.4;Participation;51
1.4.3.5;Secrecy;53
1.4.3.6;Funding;54
1.4.3.7;Backing;55
1.4.3.8;Outcome;56
1.4.4;Case 3 –OPIC (Stockholm);58
1.4.4.1;Participants;60
1.4.4.2;Character of conflict;60
1.4.4.3;Stage of conflict;61
1.4.4.4;Participation;62
1.4.4.5;Secrecy;62
1.4.4.6;Funding;63
1.4.4.7;Backing;63
1.4.4.8;Outcome;64
1.5;PART III – RESULTS;66
1.5.1;Participants;66
1.5.2;Character of conflict;67
1.5.3;Stage of conflict;68
1.5.4;Participation;68
1.5.5;Secrecy;69
1.5.6;Funding;70
1.5.7;Backing;71
1.5.8;Outcome;72
1.6;PART IV – CONCLUSION;77
1.6.1;NGOs as third-parties;77
1.6.2;How did NGOs facilitate the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations in the early 1990s?;82
1.7;References:;85
1.8;APPENDICES;95