E-Book, Englisch, Band 4, 696 Seiten
Mertins / Ruggaber / Popplewell Enterprise Interoperability III
1. Auflage 2008
ISBN: 978-1-84800-221-0
Verlag: Springer
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: 1 - PDF Watermark
New Challenges and Industrial Approaches
E-Book, Englisch, Band 4, 696 Seiten
Reihe: Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences
ISBN: 978-1-84800-221-0
Verlag: Springer
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: 1 - PDF Watermark
Interoperability: the ability of a system or a product to work with other systems or products without special effort from the user is a key issue in manufacturing and industrial enterprise generally. It is fundamental to the production of goods and services quickly and at low cost at the same time as maintaining levels of quality and customisation. Composed of over 50 papers, Enterprise Interoperability III ranges from academic research through case studies to industrial and administrative experience of interoperability. The international nature of the authorship continues to broaden. Many of the papers have examples and illustrations calculated to deepen understanding and generate new ideas. A concise reference to the state of the art in software interoperability, Enterprise Interoperability III will be of great value to engineers and computer scientists working in manufacturing and other process industries and to software engineers and electronic and manufacturing engineers working in the academic environment.
Autoren/Hrsg.
Weitere Infos & Material
1;Preface;5
2;Acknowledgements;7
3;Contents;9
4;Part I Business and Strategies, Cases;15
4.1;An Approach for the Evaluation of the Agility in the Context of Enterprise Interoperability;16
4.1.1;1 Introduction;16
4.1.2;2 Related Work;17
4.1.3;3 The POIRE Framework;20
4.1.4;4 Agility Evaluation in the Context of Enterprise Interoperability;23
4.1.5;5 Conclusions;26
4.1.6;References;26
4.2;Industrialization Strategies for Cross-organizational Information Intensive Services;28
4.2.1;1 Introduction;28
4.2.2;2 Definition of Terms and Research Approach;29
4.2.3;3 A Reference Architecture for Seamless Cross-Organizational Collaboration;31
4.2.4;4 Industrialization of IIS in the Case of Swiss Public Administration;33
4.2.5;5 Conclusion;37
4.2.6;References;39
4.3;SME Maturity, Requirement for Interoperability;42
4.3.1;1 Introduction;42
4.3.2;2 Improvement Cycle;44
4.3.3;3 Maturity Model;46
4.3.4;4 Assessment Method;48
4.3.5;5 Case Study;49
4.3.6;6 Results and Business Benefits;50
4.3.7;7 Related Work;51
4.3.8;8 Conclusion;51
4.3.9;Acknowledgement;52
4.3.10;References;52
4.4;Information Security Problems and Needs in Healthcare – A Case Study of Norway and Finland vs Sweden;54
4.4.1;1 Introduction;54
4.4.2;2 Information Security Model;55
4.4.3;3 Information Security in Healthcare;56
4.4.4;4 The Case Studies;57
4.4.5;5 Results;58
4.4.6;6 Discussion and Comparison with the Swedish Study;62
4.4.7;7 Summarizing Discussion;65
4.4.8;References;65
4.5;Impact of Application Lifecycle Management – A Case Study;68
4.5.1;1 Introduction;68
4.5.2;2 Related Research;69
4.5.3;3 Research Approach;71
4.5.4;4 Results;72
4.5.5;5 Discussion;77
4.5.6;6 Conclusions;78
4.5.7;References;79
5;Part II Cross-organizational Collaboration and Cross- sectoral Processes;82
5.1;A Service-oriented Reference Architecture for Organizing Cross- Company Collaboration;84
5.1.1;1 Motivation;84
5.1.2;2 State-of-the-Art in Multienterprise Electronic Interaction and Shortcomings;85
5.1.3;3 A Service-Oriented Reference Architecture;88
5.1.4;4 Conclusion;94
5.1.5;References;95
5.2;Patterns for Distributed Scrum – A Case Study;98
5.2.1;1 Introduction;98
5.2.2;2 Research Approach;101
5.2.3;3 Results;102
5.2.4;5 Discussion;107
5.2.5;6 Conclusions;109
5.2.6;References;109
5.3;Understanding the Collaborative Workspaces;112
5.3.1;1 Introduction;112
5.3.2;2 Understanding Collaboration;113
5.3.3;3 The Organisational Layers;114
5.3.4;4 The Life Cycles;116
5.3.5;5 The Processes and the Motivation;118
5.3.6;6 Virtual Organisations;119
5.3.7;7 Information Flows;121
5.3.8;8 Conclusion;122
5.3.9;Acknowledgments;123
5.3.10;References;123
5.4;Models and Methods for Web-support of a Multi- disciplinary B2( B2B) Network;126
5.4.1;1 Introduction;126
5.4.2;2 The B2(B2B) Background and its Interoperability Challenges;127
5.4.3;3 Template Model, As-is Models and the General Model;129
5.4.4;4 B2(B2B) Business Process Model;130
5.4.5;5 Interdisciplinary Service Model and Network Model;133
5.4.6;6 Summary and Outlook;134
5.4.7;Acknowledgements;135
5.4.8;References;135
5.5;Platform Design for the B2(B2B) Approach;138
5.5.1;1 Introduction;138
5.5.2;2 Architecture Overview;139
5.5.3;3 Technologies for Development and Technologies for Design;140
5.5.4;4 Components for Modelling;142
5.5.5;5 Components for Managing;144
5.5.6;6 Summary;145
5.5.7;References;146
5.6;Trust and Security in Collaborative Environments;148
5.6.1;1 Introduction;148
5.6.2;2 Basic Concepts;149
5.6.3;3 Trust and Security on Web-based Platforms;152
5.6.4;4 Conclusion;154
5.6.5;Acknowledgements;155
5.6.6;References;155
5.7;Prototype to Support Morphism between BPMN Collaborative Process Model and Collaborative SOA Architecture Model;158
5.7.1;1 Introduction;158
5.7.2;2 Definition of a Morphism;159
5.7.3;3 Definition of the Meta-Models;160
5.7.4;4 Definition of the Transformation Rules;162
5.7.5;5 Prototype Development;166
5.7.6;6 Conclusion and Perspectives;169
5.7.7;References;170
5.8;Heterogeneous Domains’ e-Business Transactions Interoperability with the use of Generic Process Models;172
5.8.1;1 Introduction;172
5.8.2;2 Process Modeling Methodology Developed and Applied;174
5.8.3;3 Generic Business Process Models;175
5.8.4;4 Conclusions;180
5.8.5;5 Future Work;182
5.8.6;References;183
5.9;Matching of Process Data and Operational Data for a Deep Business Analysis;184
5.9.1;1 Introduction;184
5.9.2;2 Deep Business Analysis;185
5.9.3;3 Towards a Matching Framework;189
5.9.4;4 Architecture of the Matching Framework;191
5.9.5;5 Related Work;193
5.9.6;6 Summary;194
5.9.7;References;195
5.10;Methods for Design of Semantic Message-Based B2B Interaction Standards;196
5.10.1;1 Introduction;196
5.10.2;2 Overview of UML-Based Design Methodologies;197
5.10.3;3 Selection Criteria;203
5.10.4;4 Conclusions;205
5.10.5;References;206
6;Part III Service Design and Execution;208
6.1;An Adaptive Service-Oriented Architecture;210
6.1.1;1 Introduction;210
6.1.2;2 Service Oriented Architecture;212
6.1.3;3 Adaptive Service-Oriented Architecture;215
6.1.4;3.2 ASOA Ontology;216
6.1.5;4 A Prototypical Adaptive Architecture;217
6.1.6;5 Related Work;220
6.1.7;6 Conclusion;220
6.1.8;References;221
6.2;FUSE: A Framework to Support Services Unified Process;222
6.2.1;1 Introduction;222
6.2.2;2 Challenges for the Adoption of the Service-Oriented Approach;223
6.2.3;3 Existing Approaches and Related Projects;225
6.2.4;4 FUSE Framework Overview;227
6.2.5;5 FUSE Framework Implementation;229
6.2.6;6 Conclusions and Future Work;232
6.2.7;References;232
6.3;Adopting Service Oriented Architectures Made Simple;234
6.3.1;1 Introduction;234
6.3.2;2 Myths Related to SOA;235
6.3.3;3 The Four Pillars for a Successful SOA Adoption;236
6.3.4;4 How to Adopt SOA from a Management Perspective;239
6.3.5;5 SOA vs Traditional Development;240
6.3.6;6 Adopting SOA at Technological Level;241
6.3.7;7 Conclusions;244
6.3.8;References;245
6.4;Making Service-Oriented Java Applications Interoperable without Compromising Transparency;246
6.4.1;1 Introduction;246
6.4.2;2 The Transparency–Interoperability Tradeoff in Java;247
6.4.3;3 ServiceJ. A Java Dialect for Client-Service Interactions;250
6.4.4;4 Compiling ServiceJ to Java. Injecting Interoperability;251
6.4.5;5 Example;255
6.4.6;6 Related Work;256
6.4.7;7 Conclusion;257
6.4.8;References;257
6.5;A Service Behavior Model for Description of Co- Production Feature of Services;260
6.5.1;1 Introduction;260
6.5.2;2 Key Aspects of Service Behavior Models;262
6.5.3;3 Service-Provider-Customer (SPC) Model;264
6.5.4;4 Comparisons between SPC and other Service Behavior Models;271
6.5.5;5 Conclusions;272
6.5.6;Acknowledgement;272
6.5.7;References;272
6.6;An Abstract Interaction Concept for Designing Interaction Behaviour of Service Compositions2;274
6.6.1;1 Introduction;274
6.6.2;2 Problems with Current Interaction Design Concepts;275
6.6.3;3 Interaction Design Concept for High Abstraction Levels;276
6.6.4;4 Comparison with BPMN;280
6.6.5;5 Conclusions;284
6.6.6;References;285
6.7;Preference-based Service Level Matchmaking for Composite Service;288
6.7.1;1 Introduction;288
6.7.2;2 Related Works;289
6.7.3;3 A Service Level Matchmaking Scenario;291
6.7.4;4 Automatic Service Level Matchmaking Mechanism;292
6.7.5;5 Service Level Automatic Generating approach for Composite Service;295
6.7.6;6 Experiments and Evaluation;298
6.7.7;7 Conclusion;299
6.7.8;Acknowledgement;300
6.7.9;References;300
6.8;Ontological Support in eGovernment Interoperability through Service Registries;302
6.8.1;1 Introduction;302
6.8.2;2 Background and Scope;303
6.8.3;3 Defining the eGovernment Ontology;304
6.8.4;4 Combining Processes and Data;307
6.8.5;5 The Interoperability Registry Platform;309
6.8.6;6 Population of the Repository;310
6.8.7;7 Conclusions;311
6.8.8;References;312
6.9;Towards Secured and Interoperable Business Services;314
6.9.1;1 Introduction;314
6.9.2;2 Challenges in Ecosystem of Services;315
6.9.3;3 Secure Interoperable Business Organisation;317
6.9.4;4 Implementation Architecture;322
6.9.5;5 Conclusion and Further Works;323
6.9.6;Acknowledgements;323
6.9.7;References;323
7;Part IV Ontologyies and Semantics for Interoperability;326
7.1;Semantic Web Services based Data Exchange for Distributed and Heterogeneous Systems;328
7.1.1;1 Introduction;328
7.1.2;2 Terms and Definitions;330
7.1.3;3 Data Exchange Method;331
7.1.4;4 Web Services Matching Mechanism;334
7.1.5;5 Prototype System;338
7.1.6;6 Conclusions;339
7.1.7;References;340
7.2;Ontology-driven Semantic Mapping;342
7.2.1;1 Introduction;342
7.2.2;2 Related Work;343
7.2.3;3 Mapping of Business Schemata;345
7.2.4;4 Logical Data Model Ontology;347
7.2.5;5 Ontology-driven Semantic Mapping;349
7.2.6;6 Discussion and Future Research;352
7.2.7;Acknowledgments;353
7.2.8;References;353
7.3;Self-Organising Service Networks for Semantic Interoperability Support in Virtual Enterprises;356
7.3.1;1 Introduction;356
7.3.2;2 Proposed Approach;358
7.3.3;3 Technological Framework;361
7.3.4;4 Conclusion;364
7.3.5;Acknowledgments;364
7.3.6;References;365
7.4;Semantic Service Matching in the Context of ODSOI Project;366
7.4.1;1 Introduction;366
7.4.2;2 Related Work;367
7.4.3;3 Main Principles of the Semantic Service Matching;369
7.4.4;4 Semantic Service Similarity;370
7.4.5;5 Global Semantic Service Similarity;370
7.4.6;6 Elementary Semantic Service Similarity;371
7.4.7;7 Semantic Ontology Concept Similarity;372
7.4.8;8 Preliminary Experimental Results and main Lessons Learned;374
7.4.9;9 Conclusions and Future Work;376
7.4.10;Disclaimer;377
7.4.11;References;377
7.5;Ontology-based Service Component Model for Interoperability of Service Systems;380
7.5.1;1 Introduction;380
7.5.2;2 Service System and Typical Interoperability Requirements;382
7.5.3;3 Domain-specific Service Ontology;385
7.5.4;4 Interoperability-oriented Unified Service Component Model;388
7.5.5;5 SC Composition Based Service System Interoperability Solutions;390
7.5.6;6 Conclusions;391
7.5.7;Acknowledgement;392
7.5.8;References;392
7.6;Supporting Adaptive Enterprise Collaboration through Semantic Knowledge Services;394
7.6.1;1 Introduction;394
7.6.2;2 Motivation;395
7.6.3;3 The SYNERGY Approach;398
7.6.4;3.2 Conceptual Architecture;399
7.6.5;4 Related Work;402
7.6.6;5 Conclusions;404
7.6.7;References;405
8;Part V Interoperability in Systems Engineering;408
8.1;Semantic Web Framework for Rule-Based Generation of Knowledge and Simulation of Manufacturing Systems;410
8.1.1;1 Introduction;410
8.1.2;2 Related Enabling Technologies and Developments;412
8.1.3;3 Functionalities Required for the Generation of Knowledge;414
8.1.4;4 Framework for the Generation of Knowledge within the Manufacturing Domain;415
8.1.5;5 Conclusions and Future Developments;420
8.1.6;References;421
8.2;Semantic Interoperability Requirements for Manufacturing Knowledge Sharing;424
8.2.1;1 Introduction;424
8.2.2;2 Manufacturing Information and Knowledge Support Systems;426
8.2.3;3 Understanding Semantic Requirements for Knowledge Sharing;427
8.2.4;X;428
8.2.5;4 Discussions and Conclusions;432
8.2.6;References;434
8.3;Collaborative Product Development: EADS Pilot Based on ATHENA;436
8.3.1;1 Introduction: Interoperability Needs and Issues for Emerging Networked Organization;437
8.3.2;2 State of the Art Concerning Standard Based Technological Interoperability Frameworks to Reuse;439
8.3.3;3 Proposed Federation Framework;441
8.3.4;4 Application to a Product Lifecycle Management Collaborative Platform;446
8.3.5;5 Conclusion and Perspectives;447
8.3.6;References;447
8.4;Contribution to Knowledge-based Methodology for Collaborative Process Definition: Knowledge Extraction from 6napse Platform;450
8.4.1;1 Introduction;450
8.4.2;2 6napse Collaborative Platform;452
8.4.3;3 Collaborative Network Ontology (CNO);453
8.4.4;4 Knowledge Extraction from 6napse Platform;456
8.4.5;5 Conclusion;461
8.4.6;References;461
8.5;SQFD: QFD-based Service Quality Assurance for the Lifecycle of Services;464
8.5.1;1 Introduction;464
8.5.2;2 Service Quality and SQFD;465
8.5.3;3 Build-time QFD-oriented Service Quality Design;469
8.5.4;4 Run-time Quality/Performance Evaluation;471
8.5.5;5 Service Quality/Performance Optimization;472
8.5.6;6 Conclusion;473
8.5.7;Acknowledgement;473
8.5.8;References;473
8.6;Coevolutionary Computation Based Iterative Multi- Attribute Auctions;474
8.6.1;1 Introduction;474
8.6.2;2 Multi-attribute Auction Problem;476
8.6.3;3 Iterative Multi-attribute Auction Mechanism;476
8.6.4;4 Coevolutionary Computation Based Multi-attribute Auction;477
8.6.5;5 Computational Results;479
8.6.6;6 Discussion;480
8.6.7;7 Conclusions;481
8.6.8;References;481
8.7;Knowledge Integration in Global Engineering;484
8.7.1;1 Introduction;484
8.7.2;2 Global Engineering;485
8.7.3;3 Challenges in Global Engineering;485
8.7.4;4 Global Virtual Team Environments;488
8.7.5;5 Knowledge Integration a Key in Global Engineering?;491
8.7.6;6 Conclusion;494
8.7.7;References;495
9;Part VI Modelling and Meta-modelling Methods and Tools for Interoperability;496
9.1;A Framework for Executable Enterprise Application Integration Patterns;498
9.1.1;1 Introduction;498
9.1.2;2 EAI Patterns and MDA;500
9.1.3;3 Parameterization of EAI Patterns;502
9.1.4;4 Model Transformation;505
9.1.5;5 Conclusions and Outlook;508
9.1.6;References;509
9.2;Experiences of Tool Integration: Development and Validation;512
9.2.1;1 Introduction;512
9.2.2;2 Background: Existing Tool Integration Solutions;513
9.2.3;3 Tool Integration Concepts;517
9.2.4;4 Generalisation of ToolChain;519
9.2.5;5 Experiences of Implementation: Validation of Tool Chain;521
9.2.6;6 Conclusions and further research;522
9.2.7;Acknowledgements;523
9.2.8;References;523
9.3;Interoperability – Network Systems for SMEs;524
9.3.1;1 Introduction;524
9.3.2;2 Situation in Research and Industry;525
9.3.3;3 Solutions Provided to Industry;527
9.3.4;4 Conclusion and Outlook;531
9.3.5;References;532
9.4;Engineer to Order Supply Chain Improvement Based on the GRAI Meta- model for Interoperability: An Empirical Study;534
9.4.1;1 Introduction: Engineer to Order Supply Chains;534
9.4.2;2 Research Objectives;536
9.4.3;3 Research Methodology;536
9.4.4;4 Conclusions;544
9.4.5;References;544
9.5;Proposal for an Object Oriented Process Modeling Language;546
9.5.1;1 Introduction;546
9.5.2;2 Existing Process Modeling Languages;548
9.5.3;3 Proposal on an Object Oriented Process Modeling Language;550
9.5.4;4 Conclusion;557
9.5.5;References;558
9.6;Enterprise Modeling Based Application Development for Interoperability Problem Solving;560
9.6.1;1 Introduction;560
9.6.2;2 Problem Statement;561
9.6.3;3 Business Case Description;561
9.6.4;4 Development Process;562
9.6.5;5 IV&I Tool Implementation;566
9.6.6;6 RDF Based Data Exchange Interface;566
9.6.7;7 Lessons Learned;568
9.6.8;8 Conclusion and Future Work;569
9.6.9;References;570
9.7;IS Outsourcing Decisions: Can Value Modelling Be of Help?;572
9.7.1;1 Introduction;572
9.7.2;2 Requirements;573
9.7.3;3 Value Modelling and c3-value;574
9.7.4;4 IS Outsourcing Decision Process;578
9.7.5;4 Conclusion;582
9.7.6;References;582
9.8;Process Composition in Logistics: An Ontological Approach15;584
9.8.1;1 Introduction;584
9.8.2;2 Autonomic Logistics Services: Objectives and Operations;585
9.8.3;3 Dynamic Process Composition;587
9.8.4;4 BPAL Basic Components;587
9.8.5;5 The Expected Benefits of the Semantic ALS Approach;592
9.8.6;6 Related Works;592
9.8.7;7 Conclusions;593
9.8.8;References;594
9.9;Interoperability of Information Systems in Crisis Management: Crisis Modeling and Metamodeling;596
9.9.1;1 Introduction;596
9.9.2;2 Overview of the;598
9.9.3;Project;598
9.9.4;3 Crisis Characterization and Collaborative Process Deduction;600
9.9.5;4 Instantiation of an Example;603
9.9.6;5 Future work;605
9.9.7;6 Conclusion;606
9.9.8;References;606
9.10;A Novel Pattern for Complex Event Processing in RFID Applications;608
9.10.1;1 Introduction;608
9.10.2;2 The Event Hierarchy;609
9.10.3;3 Complex Event Pattern;614
9.10.4;4 Conclusions;619
9.10.5;Acknowledgments;619
9.10.6;References;619
10;Part VII Architectures and Frameworks for Interoperability;622
10.1;Enterprise Architecture: A Service Interoperability Analysis Framework;624
10.1.1;1 Introduction;624
10.1.2;2 Extended Influence Diagrams;626
10.1.3;3 A Framework for Enterprise Service Interoperability Analysis;626
10.1.4;4 Enterprise Architecture Frameworks for Analysis;629
10.1.5;5 The Metamodel for Enterprise Service Interoperability Analysis;630
10.1.6;6 Modeling and Analyzing Using the Metamodel – An Example;632
10.1.7;7 Conclusion;635
10.1.8;Acknowledgements;635
10.1.9;References;635
10.2;Logical Foundations for the Infrastructure of the Information Market;638
10.2.1;1 Introduction;638
10.2.2;2 Exactness;640
10.2.3;3 Practical Examples of Interoperability Problems;642
10.2.4;4 Interoperability and Categories;646
10.2.5;5 Conclusions;648
10.2.6;Acknowledgements;649
10.2.7;References;649
10.3;Meeting the Interoperability Challenges of eTransactions among Heterogeneous Business Partners: The Advantages of Hybrid Architectural Approaches for the Integrating Middleware;652
10.3.1;1 Introduction;652
10.3.2;2 Interoperability Challenges of eTransactions: The Enterprises Viewpoint;653
10.3.3;3 Discussion on the Underlying State of the Art;655
10.3.4;4 Roadmapping Hybrid Architectural Approaches for eTransactions;658
10.3.5;5 Conclusions and Future Work;661
10.3.6;References;662
10.4;A Model-driven, Agent-based Approach for a Rapid Integration of Interoperable Services*;664
10.4.1;1 Introduction;664
10.4.2;2 Scenario;666
10.4.3;3 Agent-based Modelling and Execution of Inter-organisational Processes;667
10.4.4;4 Interoperable Services: Improving the Integration Process;673
10.4.5;5 Related Work;674
10.4.6;6 Conclusions and Summary;674
10.4.7;References;674
10.5;BSMDR: A B/S UI Framework Based on MDR;678
10.5.1;1 Introduction;678
10.5.2;2 UI Requirements Analysis Model;680
10.5.3;3 Modeling of PIM;681
10.5.4;4 Design and Realization;685
10.5.5;5 Conclusions;689
10.5.6;References;690
10.6;A Proposal for Goal Modelling Using a UML Profile;692
10.6.1;1 Introduction;692
10.6.2;2 Linking Enterprise Models and System Models;693
10.6.3;3 Proposal for Enterprise Knowledge Modelling;695
10.6.4;4 UML Profile for GM;697
10.6.5;5 Conclusion;700
10.6.6;Acknowledgments;701
10.6.7;References;701
11;Index of Contributors;704
12;Index of Keywords;706
