E-Book, Englisch, 202 Seiten
Reihe: ISSN
Knowledge, Power and New Subjectivities
E-Book, Englisch, 202 Seiten
Reihe: ISSN
ISBN: 978-1-61451-283-7
Verlag: De Gruyter
Format: PDF
Kopierschutz: Adobe DRM (»Systemvoraussetzungen)
Zielgruppe
Scholars of and Practitioners in Language Instruction, Foreign Language, Heritage Language, Bilingual Education
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
Weitere Infos & Material
1;Acknowledgments;7
2;1 Introduction: The heritage language learner?;15
2.1;1.1 The heritage language learner?;15
2.2;1.2 Research on heritage language learners;17
2.3;1.3 Weekend Japanese language schools in the United States;19
2.4;1.4 Kokugo vs. keisho
go education and the “heritage language effect”;20
2.5;1.5 Analyzing performative construction of the heritage language learner;23
2.6;1.6 Construction of the heritage language learner;25
2.6.1;1.6.1 Constructing the heritage language learner as an object of investigation;25
2.6.2;1.6.2 Constructing heritage language learners through schooling: Two imaginings, two modes of governmentality;26
2.6.3;1.6.3 Constructing heritage language learners by giving them meanings;28
2.7;1.7 On collaboration;29
2.8;1.8 The structure of the book;31
3;2 An emerging field of investigation: Construction of the heritage language learner as a new object of study;33
3.1;2.1 A new term on the block;33
3.2;2.2 Shifts in language policies in the United States;34
3.3;2.3 Emergence of the term “heritage language” in the United States;36
3.3.1;2.3.1 Self-esteem-based definition of the heritage language learner;37
3.3.2;2.3.2 Linguistic-proficiency-based definition of the heritage language learner;39
3.3.3;2.3.3 Interconnection, disjuncture, and critique;40
3.4;2.4 Contested fields of research: Defining the heritage language learner;42
3.5;2.5 Knowledge and power;42
3.6;2.6 Reification of language, linguistic community, and language speakers: The heritage language effect;43
3.6.1;2.6.1 Reifying language and linguistic community;43
3.6.1.1;2.6.1.1 Language and nation-states;44
3.6.1.2;2.6.1.2 Standardization;47
3.6.1.3;2.6.1.3 Linguistics;50
3.6.2;2.6.2 Reifying the language speaker;52
3.6.2.1;2.6.2.1 The native speaker concept;53
3.6.2.2;2.6.2.2 Alternative notions: English as a lingua franca;55
3.6.2.3;2.6.2.3 Alternative labels;56
3.6.2.4;2.6.2.4 Contestations;57
3.7;2.7 Construction of the heritage language through research;57
4;3 Ethnographic fieldwork at Jackson Japanese Language School;59
4.1;3.1 Jackson Japanese Language School;59
4.2;3.2 The Jackson Course;62
4.3;3.3 JJLS, heritage language research, and keishogo vs. heritage language
;66
4.4;3.4 Ethnographic fieldwork at JJLS and subjectivities of the authors;71
4.5;3.5 Collecting data;73
5;4 Betwixt and between Japanese and the heritage language learner of Japanese;77
5.1;4.1 Transplanted virtual “Japan”, or Japanese school for the local community?;77
5.2;4.2 Japanese government policies on hoshuko
;79
5.3;4.3 Adapting to a changing student body at the local level;82
5.4;4.4 The road JJLS took;84
5.4.1;4.4.1 Mr. and Mrs. Ikeda: Founding members and local administrators;84
5.4.2;4.4.2 Lee: Principal of the second unit, 2004-2012;88
5.4.3;4.4.3 MEXT-sent principals;90
5.5;4.5 Construction of “Japanese” students and “heritage language learners of Japanese”;92
6;5 Designing the heritage language learner: Modes of governmentality in the classroom;95
6.1;5.1 Intended modes of governmentality in hoshuko-bu and the Jackson Course
;95
6.2;5.2 Visibility and technique;95
6.2.1;5.2.1 Learning about Takamura Kotaro in hoshuko-bu: The subject-centered approach ;100
6.2.2;5.2.2 Learning about John Manjiro and beyond in the Jackson Course: The holistic approach;102
6.3;5.3 Knowledge;104
6.4;5.4 Subjectivities;105
6.4.1;5.4.1 On supporting Japan’s future;105
6.4.2;5.4.2 A hoshuko-bu teacher’s view;106
6.4.3;5.4.3 On the voting age;107
6.4.4;5.4.4 On abortion in Korea and other countries;108
6.4.5;5.4.5 A Jackson Course teacher’s view;109
6.5;5.5 Molding heritage language learners;110
7;6 Defining the heritage language learner;112
7.1;6.1 Practices and perceptions;112
7.2;6.2 Carving out legitimacy: The Jackson Course administrators and MEXT officials;113
7.3;6.3 Deciding (not) to join the Jackson Course: Cases of five students;114
7.3.1;6.3.1 “Rescued students”;115
7.3.1.1;6.3.1.1 Sasha: A Jackson Course old-timer;115
7.3.2;6.3.2 “Potential traversers”;117
7.3.2.1;6.3.2.1 Anne: Staying in hoshuko-bu;118
7.3.2.2;6.3.2.2 Mayumi: Moved from hoshuko-bu to the Jackson Course after 6th grade;119
7.3.2.3;6.3.2.3 Junko: Regime of difference of top- vs. lower-track class;120
7.3.3;6.3.3 “System outsiders”;124
7.3.3.1;6.3.3.1 Martin: Starting JJLS in the Jackson Course;124
7.4;6.4 One classroom, two perceptions, two modes of governmentality;127
7.4.1;6.4.1 Mayumi: Staying in the Jackson Course;127
7.4.2;6.4.2 Junko: Moving back to hoshuko-bu from the Jackson Course;128
7.4.3;6.4.3 Perceptions and experienced governmentality;129
7.5;6.5 Legitimacy, meanings, and modes of governmentality;131
7.5.1;6.5.1 Competing mentalities of governmentality and invested meanings;131
7.5.2;6.5.2 Creation of legitimacy and schooling;132
8;7 Shifting frames of reference: JJLS, AP, heading college, and construction of the Japanese-as-a-heritage-language learner;134
8.1;7.1 What makes one continue learning a heritage language;134
8.2;7.2 Minority language education and the mainstream educational system;136
8.3;7.3 Japanese language in US mainstream education;137
8.4;7.4 Students’ and parents’ experiences;137
8.4.1;7.4.1 Mayumi: After taking AP examination, left JJLS right before graduation;138
8.4.2;7.4.2 Jake: Left JJLS after 8th grade;141
8.4.3;7.4.3 Anne: Left JJLS after middle school but took AP Japanese examination;145
8.5;7.5 Changing motivations and the mainstream education system;148
8.6;7.6 Construction of subjects and two frames of reference;150
8.7;7.7 The AP Japanese examination as interface;151
8.8;7.8 Conclusion;152
9;8 Adjusting the Jackson Course;153
9.1;8.1 Imagining and accommodating heritage language learners;153
9.2;8.2 Responding to parents’ perceptions;153
9.3;8.3 Responding to students’ lives in the United States;157
9.4;8.4 Responding to the MEXT’s positions;157
9.5;8.5 Implications;158
10;9 Implications and departure;160
10.1;9.1 Construction of the heritage language learner;160
10.2;9.2 Theoretical implications;160
10.3;9.3 Practical implications of administrator involvement in research;162
10.4;9.4 Suggestions following from this study’s findings;164
10.5;9.5 Heritage as a new imagining;169
11;Appendix 1: First Questionnaires for Parents;171
12;Appendix 2: Second Questionnaires for Parents;174
13;Appendix 3: First Questionnaires for Students;177
14;Appendix 4: Second Questionnaires for Students;179
15;Appendix 5: Questionnaires for Teachers;181
16;Appendix 6: Questionnaires for Parents of Students Who Were Leaving or Had Left JJLS;183
17;Appendix 7: Questionnaires for Students Who Were Leaving or Had Left JJLS;184
18;Appendix 8: Summary of Student Interviews and Profiles;185
19;Appendix 9: Glossary of Japanese Terms;188
20;References;189
21;Index;201